You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would be great to expand the BIGG database with additional reactions. Suggest checking other biochemical databases: ModelSEED, BioCyc, and align namespaces (e.g., metanetx).
Additionally, would be very useful to expand not only biochemical representation but enzyme sequence representation. Perhaps even use HMMs instead of blastx?
UPDATE:
modelSEED uses RAST annotations to link enzymes to genes, so a (prokaryotic) genome must be first annotated with RAST. For plants and funghi, they used a different annotation pipeline, specific to these groups. I only see ec numbers in their reactions.tsv file, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would be great to expand the BIGG database with additional reactions. Suggest checking other biochemical databases: ModelSEED, BioCyc, and align namespaces (e.g., metanetx).
Additionally, would be very useful to expand not only biochemical representation but enzyme sequence representation. Perhaps even use HMMs instead of blastx?
UPDATE:
modelSEED uses RAST annotations to link enzymes to genes, so a (prokaryotic) genome must be first annotated with RAST. For plants and funghi, they used a different annotation pipeline, specific to these groups. I only see ec numbers in their reactions.tsv file, though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: