You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello all! I am building remote station, which will be placed at a good remote place with a wide open horizon, but the 4G connection data plan is limited. So looking at the traffic of my home station i thinking about a solution to that problem. I want to ask is it will be possible to run only [dump1090-fa] with Skyaware on the remote place and run another station at the home location with Thom-x [docker-fr24feed-piaware-dump1090] to reduce the traffic. Remote and home have static IP and all possible port forwardings. I am just don't know if the Thom-x docker image could be configured to suit my needs and save the traffic bandwidth of the remote station, please advice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's possible, I run mine like that. Only dump1090 on one side connected to the dongle, and on the other side dump1090 connecting to the remote dongle (net-only).
Hello all! I am building remote station, which will be placed at a good remote place with a wide open horizon, but the 4G connection data plan is limited. So looking at the traffic of my home station i thinking about a solution to that problem. I want to ask is it will be possible to run only [dump1090-fa] with Skyaware on the remote place and run another station at the home location with Thom-x [docker-fr24feed-piaware-dump1090] to reduce the traffic. Remote and home have static IP and all possible port forwardings. I am just don't know if the Thom-x docker image could be configured to suit my needs and save the traffic bandwidth of the remote station, please advice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: