Replies: 2 comments
-
Copied from Uninett/Argus#206 (comment): @lunkwill42 said:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
.. maybe they should have a "stateless"-event instead of a start-event.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Stateless incidents (end_time == null) look too much like stateful incidents (end_time != null). There's no controls for showing/hiding stateless incidents. They are visible in the incident-list if "Both" is on for both acked and openness. In the detail-box, they lack duration, but there's nothing else that marks it as stateless. They currently have a start event, this is probably not a good idea.
A stateless incident logically doesn't really have a start time or end time, just a timestamp. We just reuse the
start_time
-field to hold the value.See also Uninett/Argus#206.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions