Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What is the rationale behind putting the Digital Signature on the Provenance resource, and not on the Bundle as an "envelope?" Is the intention to use the x-provenance header to submit the Provenance as the Provenance on the Bundle? or is the Provenance resource referring to the Composition Resource? #42

Open
litlfred opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

What is the rationale behind putting the Digital Signature on the Provenance resource, and not on the Bundle as an "envelope?" Is the intention to use the x-provenance header to submit the Provenance as the Provenance on the Bundle? or is the Provenance resource referring to the Composition Resource? #42

litlfred opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@litlfred
Copy link
Collaborator

litlfred commented May 3, 2021

**What is the rationale behind putting the Digital Signature on the Provenance resource, and not on the Bundle as an "envelope?" Is the intention to use the x-provenance header to submit the Provenance as the Provenance on the Bundle? or is the Provenance resource referring to the Composition Resource? **

Document: FHIR.WHO.SVC-RC2\Provenance of SVC - FHIR v4.0.1
Section: Resource Profile: Provenance of SVC
Organization: Alex Goel Independent
Mail: alex.goel@purajuniper.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@litlfred