-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathtest_my_planning_graph.py
169 lines (141 loc) · 9.13 KB
/
test_my_planning_graph.py
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
import unittest
from itertools import chain
from aimacode.utils import expr
from aimacode.planning import Action
from aimacode.search import Node
from example_have_cake import have_cake
from air_cargo_problems import (
air_cargo_p1, air_cargo_p2, air_cargo_p3, air_cargo_p4
)
from my_planning_graph import PlanningGraph, LiteralLayer, ActionLayer
from layers import makeNoOp, make_node
class TestPlanningGraphHeuristics(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.cake_problem = have_cake()
self.ac_problem_1 = air_cargo_p1()
self.ac_problem_2 = air_cargo_p2()
self.ac_problem_3 = air_cargo_p3()
self.ac_problem_4 = air_cargo_p4()
self.cake_node = Node(self.cake_problem.initial)
self.ac_node_1 = Node(self.ac_problem_1.initial)
self.ac_node_2 = Node(self.ac_problem_2.initial)
self.ac_node_3 = Node(self.ac_problem_3.initial)
self.ac_node_4 = Node(self.ac_problem_4.initial)
def test_levelsum(self):
self.assertEqual(self.cake_problem.h_pg_levelsum(self.cake_node), 1)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_1.h_pg_levelsum(self.ac_node_1), 4)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_2.h_pg_levelsum(self.ac_node_2), 6)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_3.h_pg_levelsum(self.ac_node_3), 10)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_4.h_pg_levelsum(self.ac_node_4), 13)
def test_maxlevel(self):
self.assertEqual(self.cake_problem.h_pg_maxlevel(self.cake_node), 1)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_1.h_pg_maxlevel(self.ac_node_1), 2)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_2.h_pg_maxlevel(self.ac_node_2), 2)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_3.h_pg_maxlevel(self.ac_node_3), 3)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_4.h_pg_maxlevel(self.ac_node_4), 3)
def test_setlevel(self):
self.assertEqual(self.cake_problem.h_pg_setlevel(self.cake_node), 2)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_1.h_pg_setlevel(self.ac_node_1), 4)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_2.h_pg_setlevel(self.ac_node_2), 4)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_3.h_pg_setlevel(self.ac_node_3), 6)
self.assertEqual(self.ac_problem_4.h_pg_setlevel(self.ac_node_4), 6)
class TestPlanningGraphMutex(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.cake_problem = have_cake()
self.cake_pg = PlanningGraph(self.cake_problem, self.cake_problem.initial, serialize=False).fill()
eat_action, bake_action = [a for a in self.cake_pg._actionNodes if not a.no_op]
no_ops = [a for a in self.cake_pg._actionNodes if a.no_op]
# bake has the effect Have(Cake) which is the logical negation of the effect
# ~Have(cake) from the persistence action ~NoOp::Have(cake)
self.inconsistent_effects_actions = [bake_action, no_ops[3]]
# the persistence action ~NoOp::Have(cake) has the effect ~Have(cake), which is
# the logical negation of Have(cake) -- the precondition for the Eat(cake) action
self.interference_actions = [eat_action, no_ops[3]]
# eat has precondition Have(cake) and bake has precondition ~Have(cake)
# which are logical inverses, so eat & bake should be mutex at every
# level of the planning graph where both actions appear
self.competing_needs_actions = [eat_action, bake_action]
self.ac_problem = air_cargo_p1()
self.ac_pg_serial = PlanningGraph(self.ac_problem, self.ac_problem.initial).fill()
# In(C1, P2) and In(C2, P1) have inconsistent support when they first appear in
# the air cargo problem,
self.inconsistent_support_literals = [expr("In(C1, P2)"), expr("In(C2, P1)")]
# some independent nodes for testing mutexes
at_here = expr('At(here)')
at_there = expr('At(there)')
self.pos_literals = [at_here, at_there]
self.neg_literals = [~x for x in self.pos_literals]
self.literal_layer = LiteralLayer(self.pos_literals + self.neg_literals, ActionLayer())
self.literal_layer.update_mutexes()
# independent actions for testing mutex
self.actions = [
make_node(Action(expr('Go(here)'), [set(), set()], [set([at_here]), set()])),
make_node(Action(expr('Go(there)'), [set(), set()], [set([at_there]), set()]))
]
self.no_ops = [make_node(x) for x in chain(*(makeNoOp(l) for l in self.pos_literals))]
self.action_layer = ActionLayer(self.no_ops + self.actions, self.literal_layer)
self.action_layer.update_mutexes()
for action in self.no_ops + self.actions:
self.action_layer.add_inbound_edges(action, action.preconditions)
self.action_layer.add_outbound_edges(action, action.effects)
def test_inconsistent_effects_mutex(self):
acts = [self.actions[0], self.no_ops[0]]
self.assertFalse(self.action_layer._inconsistent_effects(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by inconsistent effects".format(*acts))
acts = [self.actions[0], self.no_ops[1]]
self.assertTrue(self.action_layer._inconsistent_effects(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by inconsistent effects".format(*acts))
# inconsistent effects mutexes are static -- they should appear in the last layer of the planning graph
for idx, layer in enumerate(self.cake_pg.action_layers):
if set(self.inconsistent_effects_actions) <= layer:
self.assertTrue(layer.is_mutex(*self.inconsistent_effects_actions),
("Actions {} and {} were not mutex in layer {} of the planning graph").format(
self.inconsistent_effects_actions[0], self.inconsistent_effects_actions[1], idx)
)
def test_interference_mutex(self):
acts = [self.actions[0], self.actions[1]]
self.assertFalse(self.action_layer._interference(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by interference".format(*acts))
acts = [self.actions[0], self.no_ops[1]]
self.assertTrue(self.action_layer._interference(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by interference".format(*acts))
# interference mutexes are static -- they should appear in the last layer of the planning graph
for idx, layer in enumerate(self.cake_pg.action_layers):
if set(self.interference_actions) <= layer:
self.assertTrue(layer.is_mutex(*self.interference_actions),
("Actions {} and {} were not mutex in layer {} of the planning graph").format(
self.interference_actions[0], self.interference_actions[1], idx)
)
def test_competing_needs_mutex(self):
acts = [self.no_ops[0], self.no_ops[2]]
self.assertFalse(self.action_layer._competing_needs(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by competing needs".format(*acts))
acts = [self.no_ops[0], self.no_ops[1]]
self.assertTrue(self.action_layer._competing_needs(*acts),
"'{!s}' and '{!s}' should be mutually exclusive by competing needs".format(*acts))
# interference mutexes are dynamic -- they only appear in some levels of the planning graph
for idx, layer in enumerate(self.cake_pg.action_layers):
if set(self.competing_needs_actions) <= layer:
self.assertTrue(layer.is_mutex(*self.competing_needs_actions),
("Actions {} and {} were not mutex in layer {} of the planning graph").format(
self.competing_needs_actions[0], self.competing_needs_actions[1], idx)
)
def test_negation_mutex(self):
lits = [self.pos_literals[0], self.neg_literals[0]]
self.assertTrue(self.literal_layer._negation(*lits),
"The literals '{}' and '{}' should be mutually exclusive by negation".format(*lits))
lits = [self.pos_literals[0], self.neg_literals[1]]
self.assertFalse(self.literal_layer._negation(*lits),
"The literals '{}' and '{}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by negation".format(*lits))
# Negation mutexes are static, so they should appear in every layer of the planning graph
self.assertTrue(all(self.cake_pg.literal_layers[-1].is_mutex(l, ~l) for l in self.cake_problem.state_map),
"One or more literal was not marked as mutex with its negation in the last layer of the planning graph"
)
def test_inconsistent_support_mutex(self):
# inconsistent support mutexes are dynamic -- they should not remain mutex at the last layer
self.assertTrue(self.ac_pg_serial.literal_layers[2]._inconsistent_support(*self.inconsistent_support_literals),
"The literals '{}' and '{}' should be mutually exclusive by inconsistent support in the second layer".format(*self.inconsistent_support_literals))
self.assertFalse(self.ac_pg_serial.literal_layers[-1]._inconsistent_support(*self.inconsistent_support_literals),
"The literals '{}' and '{}' should NOT be mutually exclusive by inconsistent support in the last layer".format(*self.inconsistent_support_literals))
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()