PPpro - Phosh - Phoc - Fails to bind address #132
Answered
by
any1
MatthewABrantley
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 7 replies
-
0.0.0.0:5901 is not an address. Try with a space instead of colon
…On Fri, 25 Mar 2022, 18:25 Raltrwx, ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm using a freshly updated arch linux ARM image (Danctnix) using Phosh,
which after a few minutes of research I'm rather sure is using "phoc" as
the compositor, which is wlroots based, so I think it should be compatible?
I am unable to start wayvnc at all, it always fails to bind to the
address. Just to test everything, I'm just trying to get it up listening on
0.0.0.0, and I've tried quite a few ports, like 1703, 5901, 5902, and a few
other random ones.
***@***.*** ~]$ wayvnc 0.0.0.0:5901
ERROR: Failed to bind to address
SSH works, I've checked that rfkill isn't blocking, unsure what's wrong.
Been trying to find wayvnc logs or something.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUKKZRHSPBLTPVOS6QVA53VBYALFANCNFSM5RU4ZRFA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Answer selected by
MatthewABrantley
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm using a freshly updated arch linux ARM image (Danctnix) using Phosh, which after a few minutes of research I'm rather sure is using "phoc" as the compositor, which is wlroots based, so I think it should be compatible?
I am unable to start wayvnc at all, it always fails to bind to the address. Just to test everything, I'm just trying to get it up listening on 0.0.0.0, and I've tried quite a few ports, like 1703, 5901, 5902, and a few other random ones.
SSH works, I've checked that rfkill isn't blocking, unsure what's wrong. Been trying to find wayvnc logs or something.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions