Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Build Docker images for Beam releases in a standard location #26578

Closed
15 tasks
chamikaramj opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
15 tasks
Assignees

Comments

@chamikaramj
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to happen?

Currently we build Docker images for Beam releases in the local machine of the release manager.

This process is brittle and may result in Docker images that are broken or inconsistent with the Docker images that we use for tests. See #26576 for an example issue.

We should build Docker images in a standard location (for example, on a bullseye container) and use consistent images for tests and releases.

Issue Priority

Priority: 2 (default / most feature requests should be filed as P2)

Issue Components

  • Component: Python SDK
  • Component: Java SDK
  • Component: Go SDK
  • Component: Typescript SDK
  • Component: IO connector
  • Component: Beam examples
  • Component: Beam playground
  • Component: Beam katas
  • Component: Website
  • Component: Spark Runner
  • Component: Flink Runner
  • Component: Samza Runner
  • Component: Twister2 Runner
  • Component: Hazelcast Jet Runner
  • Component: Google Cloud Dataflow Runner
@chamikaramj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@damccorm is this something you can track for as a part of Beam release process improvements ?

@damccorm
Copy link
Contributor

damccorm commented Jan 6, 2025

This was done as part of our release process, we now build on our actions runners

@damccorm damccorm closed this as completed Jan 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.63.0 Release milestone Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants