You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And here is another Idea:
The powerful _find-Request does have the option "fields" were its possible to determine which fields of the matched documents should be returned. This optional "fields"-Option is missing on the GET DATABASE/DOCUMENT_ID - Request. When you using this request you get the whole document back, but is some cases it is neat to get only some on the document-fields back because only these might are interesting at the moment. Currently it is possible to do a workaround with the _find-Request so this feature is not that critical, but it would be nice when it will come someday so a workaround is unnecessary.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
And here is another Idea:
The powerful _find-Request does have the option "fields" were its possible to determine which fields of the matched documents should be returned. This optional "fields"-Option is missing on the GET DATABASE/DOCUMENT_ID - Request. When you using this request you get the whole document back, but is some cases it is neat to get only some on the document-fields back because only these might are interesting at the moment. Currently it is possible to do a workaround with the _find-Request so this feature is not that critical, but it would be nice when it will come someday so a workaround is unnecessary.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions