Difference between trafficRouting.managedRoutes and trafficRouting.istio.virtualService.routes ? #3722
Unanswered
bgreen9595
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
I am not an expert on istio but I believe that the second syntax is the "generic" one for all traffic providers. The first one is istio specific and as the documentation says it is needed only for header based routing. I believe that if you use the first syntax, the second one is implied and not really needed. If not, please open a github issue. Alternatively just using both syntaxes at the same time, shouldn't be a problem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In a canary deployment with Istio configuration/subset splitting, what is the difference between the routes specified below? The documentation specs don't give a clear distinction, other than the managedRoutes are required for setHeaderRoute and setMirrorRoute
trafficRouting:
managedRoutes:
- name: route-1
- name: route-2
istio:
virtualService:
routes:
- route-1
- route-2
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions