Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extended References on Toolkits & Standards #157

Closed
ax3l opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Extended References on Toolkits & Standards #157

ax3l opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@ax3l
Copy link
Contributor

ax3l commented May 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Thank you for the JOSS submission in openjournals/joss-reviews#5375 .

This is question is related to #151 and #156.

Recent Toolkits for Beam Analysis

Related to paper

There are some additional open source codes providing similar functionality to this code; these include the p2sat (lesnat (2021)) and postpic (Kuschel (2022)) codes.

Over the recent years, a couple of our colleagues implemented new analysis packages that might be interesting to either be compatible with with cite as more recent related works. In particular, I am thinking of these packages:

Accelerator Physics Codes

Additionally to the Wikipedia page linked as “Accelerator Physics Codes” (2022) and maintained by our colleague David Sagan, maybe these catalogue that we created in the Consortium for Advanced Modeling of Particle Accelerators (CAMPA) are useful:

Related by biased, I do work on this set of accelerator modeling codes:

The paper quotes

Each of these programs will typically utilize their own unique format for saving and loading phase space data. This means that getting these programs to ‘speak’ to each other is generally a substantial amount of work.

I fully agree.
We hope to overcome this, since we actively standardize I/O with openPMD in many of these codes (see #156). Thus, the first sentence could maybe be rephrased slightly or cite projects like openPMD (2015)?
@ax3l ax3l changed the title Extended References on Toolkits & Data Standards Extended References on Toolkits & Standards May 30, 2023
ax3l added a commit to ax3l/ParticlePhaseSpace that referenced this issue May 30, 2023
@ax3l
Readme: Related Packages
aba2ee6 
Related to bwheelz36#157, but might also be cited in JOSS :)
@ax3l ax3l mentioned this issue May 30, 2023
Merged
bwheelz36 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2023
@bwheelz36
update paper with new refs as per #157
26ae4b7
@bwheelz36
Copy link
Owner

Hi @ax3l
Thanks for enlightening me about these other tools! I have added references to them in the above commit.

@bwheelz36
Copy link
Owner

@ax3l, I updated as per your comments in this commit (sorry I forgot to tag this issue).
I had to make a few more minor changes to fix some typos, but that commit contains the bulk of the corrections

@ax3l
Copy link
Contributor Author

ax3l commented Jun 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Thanks a lot @bwheelz36. Please excuse the delay.

I noticed one detail and commented a suggestion in

@ax3l ax3l mentioned this issue Jun 25, 2023
Closed
ax3l added a commit to ax3l/ParticlePhaseSpace that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2023
@ax3l
openPMD-standard: Fix Authors
ec7f655 
X-ref:
- bwheelz36@87f56ed#r119609835
- openjournals/joss-reviews#5375 (comment)
- bwheelz36#157 (comment)

Close bwheelz36#157
@ax3l ax3l mentioned this issue Jun 25, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ax3l @bwheelz36