You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently faced some cases where it seemed relevant and more readable to use nested it / then / else in new recipe (rattler) format, instead of one-lining the expression. See here for a concrete case : https://github.com/conda-forge/eigenpy-feedstock/blob/5f141210cc57dc0c8cfbe9db4d7e59c3cd3f6347/recipe/recipe.yaml#L36-L48
It seems that rattler build supports such nested selectors, but conda smithy does not.
Here a simpler reproducible example that fails with conda smithy linter:
Comment:
I recently faced some cases where it seemed relevant and more readable to use nested
it / then / else
in new recipe (rattler) format, instead of one-lining the expression. See here for a concrete case : https://github.com/conda-forge/eigenpy-feedstock/blob/5f141210cc57dc0c8cfbe9db4d7e59c3cd3f6347/recipe/recipe.yaml#L36-L48It seems that
rattler build
supports such nested selectors, butconda smithy
does not.Here a simpler reproducible example that fails with conda smithy linter:
I guess the first question raised here before going further is: should it be supported in the new recipe v2 standard ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: