Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmarking HLA LOH calls on chr6 loss #44

Open
anabbi opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Benchmarking HLA LOH calls on chr6 loss #44

anabbi opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@anabbi
Copy link

anabbi commented Oct 9, 2024

Hello and thank you for your great tool! It works great on my samples. I have a question regarding one of my samples, which is ultra-pure tumor (> 90% based on ASCAT) and a chromosome 6 loss.

First of all, I did a benchmarking on HLA types against Optitype. The normal sample types were complete match between SpecHLA and Optitype. For the tumor sample:
SpecHLA called HLAA01:23, Optitype called HLAA01:01
SpecHLA called HLAB44:05, Optitype called HLAB08:01
SpecHLA called HLAC05:01, Optitype called HLAC07:01
The discrepancy, I think, is because of the chromosome loss. Here is the results of LOH call:

Sample | HLA | Allele1 | Allele2 | copyratio | KeptHLA | LossHLA | Freq1 | Freq2 | Purity | Het_num | LOH
7316-219 | A | A01:23:01 | A02:01:01:01 | 0:02 | A02:01:01:01 | A01:23:01 | 0.143 | 0.857 | 0.94 | 53 | Y
7316-219 | B | B44:02:01:17 | B44:05:01:01 | 1:01 | B44:02:01:17 | B44:05:01:01 | 0.686 | 0.314 | 0.94 | 19 | N
7316-219 | C | C05:01:01:32 | C05:01:01:02 | 1:01 | C05:01:01:32 | C05:01:01:02 | 0.562 | 0.438 | 0.94 | 40 | N
7316-219 | DPA1 | DPA101:03:01:02 | DPA101:03:01:02 | 0:02 | DPA101:03:01:02 | DPA101:03:01:02 | 0.13 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 83 | Y
7316-219 | DPB1 | DPB104:02:13 | DPB104:02:01:10 | 0:02 | DPB104:02:01:10 | DPB104:02:13 | 0.186 | 0.814 | 0.94 | 43 | Y
7316-219 | DQA1 | DQA105:03:01:01 | DQA105:01:01:02 | 1:01 | DQA105:03:01:01 | DQA105:01:01:02 | 0.712 | 0.288 | 0.94 | 5 | N
7316-219 | DQB1 | DQB103:04:01 | DQB103:01:01:01 | 0:02 | DQB103:01:01:01 | DQB103:04:01 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 137 | Y
7316-219 | DRB1 | DRB112:01:01:01 | DRB112:01:01:01 | 1:01 | DRB112:01:01:01 | DRB112:01:01:01 | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.94 | 18 | N

I was expecting to see all HLAs being called LOH, due to the chromosome 6 loss.

My question to you is that whether you have tried SpecHLA on a highly pure tumor with CNVs on chr6? And I would like to get your opinion on these results and some guidance on how to improve it. Is there some parameters that need to be adjusted depending on the sample set?

Thank you,
Arash

@wshuai294
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,

To improve it, you could use a higher value of the MAF by -r The minimum Minor Allele Frequency (MAF), default is 0.05 for full length and 0.1 for exon typing.

@anabbi
Copy link
Author

anabbi commented Oct 17, 2024

Thank you for your suggestion. I will give it a try!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants