We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
您好~我有一个疑问,为什么GPZMM复现的实验结果和论文图表里的数据不太一致呢?在论文中属性数量为100时加密的时间开销达到了80s,而在测试数据中是2s左右
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
其实,这里面有很多说不清的地方,因为实现的环境不同,最关键的是设置的访问策略的复杂难度不同,最终的时间开销也不同,我这里的访问策略设置只有两层(可以参考我设置的访问策略参数),而GPZMM里面的具体访问策略没有给出,如果其访问策略有多层的话,那么时间消耗自然就大了。因为在实验对比的时候,都是设置的同一个访问策略,分析这同一情况下的性能还是能证明优势的。
Sorry, something went wrong.
感谢解答呀!
dwwcqu
No branches or pull requests
您好~我有一个疑问,为什么GPZMM复现的实验结果和论文图表里的数据不太一致呢?在论文中属性数量为100时加密的时间开销达到了80s,而在测试数据中是2s左右
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: