You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We followed PointNet++ for this design decision, where the downsampling is performed after the first layer. In initial experiments, directly downsampling gave worse results.
I mean, "PointNetSA -> Encoder -> Encoder -> Encoder -> DownSampling", rather than "PointNetSA -> Encoder -> DownSampling -> Encoder -> Encoder".
Since it's known that DownSampling in PointNet++ loses information, "PointNetSA -> DownSampling -> Encoder -> Encoder -> Encoder" would not be a good choice.
Would this operation leads to performance drop? or because of the computational cost?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: