We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
具体情况是这样的: OSGB数据是由国产商用软件生产的国家2000(对应EPSG:4545)的倾斜数据(主要是单体化模型数据),矢量数据是通过倾斜数据采集的。在该商用软件上面加载模型和矢量,无论是国产2000坐标系还是转成WGS84坐标系都可以套合。 但是,将WGS84坐标系的矢量数据用QGIS转成geojson后,在Cesium加载与之对应的3DTiles数据就不套合了。 个人怀疑是因为商业软件的显示场景是局部场景,而Cesium是全球场景,存在畸变,请问大佬们,在不重新生产倾斜数据的前提下,有没有解决的思路?查看了下 issues #200 感觉又是不同的问题。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
具体情况是这样的:
OSGB数据是由国产商用软件生产的国家2000(对应EPSG:4545)的倾斜数据(主要是单体化模型数据),矢量数据是通过倾斜数据采集的。在该商用软件上面加载模型和矢量,无论是国产2000坐标系还是转成WGS84坐标系都可以套合。
但是,将WGS84坐标系的矢量数据用QGIS转成geojson后,在Cesium加载与之对应的3DTiles数据就不套合了。
个人怀疑是因为商业软件的显示场景是局部场景,而Cesium是全球场景,存在畸变,请问大佬们,在不重新生产倾斜数据的前提下,有没有解决的思路?查看了下 issues #200 感觉又是不同的问题。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: