You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, it's more a question from c++ beginner, not a big report or something, not sure if this is acceptable, but please let me give it a shot :)
In core.h, there's almost every definition of class member functions, except for something like Matrix4::getDeterminant or Matrix4::setInverse functions.
I learned "everything in header" approach make member functions implicitly "inline",
BUT that "inline" means nothing about optimization, but just a sign that let multiple definition of a member function exist.
So I wish someone could let me know about:
Why put everything in header, so that let compiler compile the same definition in EVERY translation unit that include core.h?
Why Matrix4::getDeterminant andcyclone::getSleepEpsilon, which is short function, in separated in .cpp file, while Matrix4::operator* , which is long function, is in header?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First, it's more a question from c++ beginner, not a big report or something, not sure if this is acceptable, but please let me give it a shot :)
In core.h, there's almost every definition of class member functions, except for something like
Matrix4::getDeterminant
orMatrix4::setInverse
functions.I learned "everything in header" approach make member functions implicitly "inline",
BUT that "inline" means nothing about optimization, but just a sign that let multiple definition of a member function exist.
So I wish someone could let me know about:
core.h
?Matrix4::getDeterminant
andcyclone::getSleepEpsilon
, which is short function, in separated in .cpp file, whileMatrix4::operator*
, which is long function, is in header?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: