You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! I wonder if it would make sense/ be desirable to add support for matching binaries to the Redbug syntax. In addition to the following (already supported) syntax:
redbug:start("x:y(<<\"hello\">>)").
One could also write:
redbug:start("x:y(<<\"he\",_/binary>>)").
Or even something like:
redbug:start("wow:do(<<_:8,_:8,0,_/binary>>").
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For some reason github doesn't notify me about new PRs (only new issues); so I haven't seen this (I'm not ignoring you).
I'm not completely sure how well this would be supported by the match spec syntax though. I suspect matching might be impossible(?). But I've considered using the erlang:binary_part guard function as a compile target.
Hi! I wonder if it would make sense/ be desirable to add support for matching binaries to the Redbug syntax. In addition to the following (already supported) syntax:
One could also write:
Or even something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: