Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronization: subClassOf axioms (misc follow-ups) #392

Open
1 of 3 tasks
joeflack4 opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Synchronization: subClassOf axioms (misc follow-ups) #392

joeflack4 opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@joeflack4
Copy link
Contributor

joeflack4 commented Jan 11, 2024

Overview

Follow-ups. I have more in Workflowy too, but probably OK not to add those to issue.

Sub-task list

  • 1. New column after column D
  • 2. obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms
  • 3. MONDO exclusion preds: CURIE -> URI?

Sub-task details

1. New column after column D

Where?: Was this for case 3? (I don't remember, but I think so. Case 1 & 5 don't seem to make sense)
Robot subheader: >A oboInOwl:source
Values: For every row, should be: MONDO:unreviewed or MONDO:not_verified

2. obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms

Not 100% sure but I think the goal here for any subclass relationship that exists in any source, if it does not exist in Mondo, we want to explicitly mark that we are excluding it. This should help document the intentionality of our hierarchy and give a way of easily being able to tell what we've looked at vs not.

I also wrote down at our last check-in meeting:

do we want to include "obo:mondo#excluded_subclassasioms" for the obsolete terms as well?

  • probably not. we decided to minimize deprecation data

not sure if this should be a separate issue or not. nico jotted down a note: "we only need it for the paper not for mondo".

  • get clarity on what that means

3. MONDO exclusion preds: CURIE -> URI?

Looks like Nico verified that CURIE works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant