You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Follow-ups. I have more in Workflowy too, but probably OK not to add those to issue.
Sub-task list
1. New column after column D
2. obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms
3. MONDO exclusion preds: CURIE -> URI?
Sub-task details
1. New column after column D
Where?: Was this for case 3? (I don't remember, but I think so. Case 1 & 5 don't seem to make sense)
Robot subheader: >A oboInOwl:source
Values: For every row, should be: MONDO:unreviewed or MONDO:not_verified
2. obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms
Not 100% sure but I think the goal here for any subclass relationship that exists in any source, if it does not exist in Mondo, we want to explicitly mark that we are excluding it. This should help document the intentionality of our hierarchy and give a way of easily being able to tell what we've looked at vs not.
I also wrote down at our last check-in meeting:
do we want to include "obo:mondo#excluded_subclassasioms" for the obsolete terms as well?
probably not. we decided to minimize deprecation data
not sure if this should be a separate issue or not. nico jotted down a note: "we only need it for the paper not for mondo".
Overview
Follow-ups. I have more in Workflowy too, but probably OK not to add those to issue.
Sub-task list
obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms
Sub-task details
1. New column after column D
Where?: Was this for case 3? (I don't remember, but I think so. Case 1 & 5 don't seem to make sense)
Robot subheader:
>A oboInOwl:source
Values: For every row, should be:
MONDO:unreviewed
orMONDO:not_verified
2.
obo:mondo#excluded_subclassaxioms
Not 100% sure but I think the goal here for any subclass relationship that exists in any source, if it does not exist in Mondo, we want to explicitly mark that we are excluding it. This should help document the intentionality of our hierarchy and give a way of easily being able to tell what we've looked at vs not.
I also wrote down at our last check-in meeting:
3. MONDO exclusion preds: CURIE -> URI?
Looks like Nico verified that CURIE works.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: