Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider introducing support for Rooms 2.0 #48

Open
mycognosist opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Consider introducing support for Rooms 2.0 #48

mycognosist opened this issue Feb 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mycognosist
Copy link
Owner

Thinking about rooms in the context of connectivity. If we have a connection manager, room support (as a client) and EBT support then we'll be a very well-equipped node.

@black-puppydog, maybe you have some thoughts about this? Do you see rooms support as a priority in your intended use-case(s) for solar?

https://ssbc.github.io/rooms2/
https://ssbc.github.io/scuttlebutt-protocol-guide/#rooms
https://github.com/ssbc/ssb-room-client

@mycognosist mycognosist added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 8, 2023
@black-puppydog
Copy link

Yes I think a lot of people nowadays onboard via rooms and indeed that's "The Way" to do things.
In fact, if anything I'd also think a modified version of solar could be used to host a super low-spec room server eventually.

@mycognosist
Copy link
Owner Author

Cool, thanks for your input! I'll start tinkering with this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants