You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey @NathanReb. Thanks again for the awesome work here.
In light of this comment, I wanted to see if it is possible after all (and not too difficult) to extend the deriving API to operate on modules, rather than only module types.
FYI, if you're curious to see the repo where I am hoping to use this, it is here.
As I mentioned in the prior conversation, I would love to be able to do the following:
@benbellick this seems very reasonable to me. I don't think @NathanReb and I currently have the bandwidth for this, but an implementation is going to look very similar to #538 only instead of class type declarations you will want module implementations -- following that PR might be the easiest way to jump in.
Hey @NathanReb. Thanks again for the awesome work here.
In light of this comment, I wanted to see if it is possible after all (and not too difficult) to extend the deriving API to operate on modules, rather than only module types.
FYI, if you're curious to see the repo where I am hoping to use this, it is here.
As I mentioned in the prior conversation, I would love to be able to do the following:
--via-ppx-->
Please let me know if this is possible and if there is time for it! Happy to help also if there is an easy way to jump into the codebase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: