You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two new carriers in the latest pypsa-eur version we are using: "solar_hsat" and "offwind_float".
We need to decide if we want to consider them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I aggregated all wind-offshore carriers to one, so offwind_float is now part of wind_offshore. That means that the capacity will be distributed to our default-not-floating offshore parks. Do you think that is fine?
Solar-hsat is still in there. I can aggregate it with either solar or solar_rooftop - do you know which one would fit better?
There are two new carriers in the latest pypsa-eur version we are using: "solar_hsat" and "offwind_float".
We need to decide if we want to consider them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: