Should FF's Pocket be disabled for better privacy?

[BraINstinct0]

Back in 2017, when Mozilla acquired Pocket, the main controversy(if any) was whether Pocket&its server would be opensourced.
It took quite some time, but as of now Pocket (and its proxy server code, at least the part controlled by Mozilla, is opensource.
However that doesn't mean it's not tracking anyone - if you use Pocket to save something, that means you will be tracked(don't get me wrong, that's not a bad thing; it's exactly the intended behavior, since it should suggest relevant reading material).
Which means...
...should extensions.pocket.enabled , which is true by default, be recommended to be set to false?

I do not have enough insights regarding Pocket's behavior, but I believe this might be a reasonable issue.

[Mikaela]

It used to be listed, but it was later cleaned up as it has nothing to do with privacy. See the prior discussion at privacytools/privacytools.io#1212 (comment).

[BraINstinct0]

Oh, I forgot to look up at the other repo....
The issue you linked to seems to discuss this thoroughly, and now I'm also rather confident it's not an issue.
Thanks for the answer!