Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page 9 is missing? #19

Open
soegaard opened this issue Jun 6, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Page 9 is missing? #19

soegaard opened this issue Jun 6, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@soegaard
Copy link

soegaard commented Jun 6, 2023

It seems
https://github.com/schemedoc/bibliography/blob/master/page9.md
is missing.

There is a page9.scm with contents but the corresponding markdown file is missing.

@lassik
Copy link
Member

lassik commented Jun 6, 2023

page9 has been entirely converted from markdown to S-expressions. The other pages are in progress.

The S-expressions -> Markdown-> HTML conversion is here: https://research.scheme.org/concurrency/

Do you have time to help out with this repo and/or the https://research.scheme.org/ website?

@lassik
Copy link
Member

lassik commented Jun 6, 2023

We can serve Markdown (via GitHub and/or scheme.org) if there's interest, but I assume good HTML would be more useful?

@soegaard
Copy link
Author

soegaard commented Jun 6, 2023

I kind like the current markdown pages in Github.
I can use the repo search in Github to find what I need.
That said, I see the extra value you have put into the scm-files.
Can you render markdown from the scm-files?

This page:

https://github.com/schemedoc/bibliography

has a link to the missing page9.md.

@lassik
Copy link
Member

lassik commented Jun 6, 2023

I kind like the current markdown pages in Github.

Somebody else said that too. It's not hard to add them back in. The scm is already rendered into md by script in tools directory.

The main point is to have a "single source of truth" in the scm files, with others generated from them.

@lassik
Copy link
Member

lassik commented Jun 6, 2023

Since you want the md files we should commit them into this repo. That avoids a needless proliferation of N slightly different readscheme-derivative repos.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants