FEAT: Provide more details to Users when Quality Checks are not met

[madpah]

Feedback from @shaikhu re. sonatype-nexus-community/scan-gradle-plugin#165

"Just a suggestion. It would be helpful to have a "Details" link next to the check (like the other checks) so we can click on it for more information."

FYI @bhamail

[bhamail]

Thoughts on what to include in the details? The implementation might dictation the "details of the details", but do we link back to comments that we would have just posted to the PR, and/or add a boiler plate note to see above comments and a link back to general docs?...just thinking out load about in the weeds "details about details".... ;)

[madpah]

I think this will require quite a bit more thought and fleshing out @bhamail before we commit to actioning anything...

[shaikhu]

Thoughts on what to include in the details?

I was thinking something similar to this PR (cyclonedx also require all commits to be signed).

Also the help doc is great for setting up your commits to be signed, but it isn't too helpful if you already have unsigned commits. How do you rectify that? Rebasing?

[madpah]

Thanks for the comments @shaikhu - we will open a ticket to improve the docs re your last point.

[madpah]

Opened sonatype-nexus-community/contribute.sonatype.com#30