How to use error
and loading
in parallel routes in "app" dir ?
#49588
Replies: 9 comments 15 replies
-
Having the same problem. Did you find solution? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Related: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
With 13.4.7 this bug is now fixed!! Closing this... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
but I also have the same issue in next 13.5.* , even though everything works properly in 13.4.7. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey devs, this routing method works correctly in 13.4.7 but it seems the bug has re-appeared in 13.5^. Can we open this issue @tresorama ?? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Reopening this discussion because of this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Testing with @NCSmit and @ivi3 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Problem in next15@rc! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
All seems working as expected. For now I close it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, i'm trying the "app" directory for first time following the official docs.
While testing "parallel routes" I wanted to test the error component.
Looking at this image in the Docs, it should be possible to render different
error
component (andloading
) for different parallel routes.I defined an
error.tsx
file inside each@folder
of a segment.Then I triggered a forced error (inside a
fetch
) , I expect to seesegment/@folder/error.tsx
rendered, but instead I seesegment/error.tsx
rendered.Same thing with
loading.tsx
, expectingsegment/@folder/loading.tsx
to be rendered and instead gotsegment/loading.tsx
.This prevent me to render different
error
component (andloading
) for different parallel routes, forcing me to have a sharederror
(andloading
) for the entire segment (that acts as parent for@folder
parallel routes)What i want is not possible ? Am I doing something wrong ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions