Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blog post about frictionless reproducibility and how 2i2c could enable environments for reproducing published articles #346

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

choldgraf
Copy link
Member

@choldgraf choldgraf commented Dec 20, 2024

This is a blog post exploring how 2i2c's infrastructure could be used to facilitate reproducible execution for communities, and potentially integrated into publishing pipelines. It comes off of a bunch of conversations I took part in at Janelia in Washington DC, and after several conversations I had with @colliand around these ideas before and after. It's similar in ideas to the AGU talk that Jim recently posted, and I've linked his talk at the bottom for further reference. @colliand if you like I am happy for you to be a co-author on this one, but for now it's just myself because I wanted to give you the invitation first.

I'd love feedback (particularly from @colliand ) about whether these convey the high-level ideas around sharing and communication on a hub, and how it could fit in with publishing pipelines. I don't think it's critical to post this immediately, but I wanted to get the ideas up while they're fresh. (cc also @jnywong who might be queuing up a stub post about Jim's talk - I feel like we could still post that one too since it is more specific than this one, and then cross-link them).

Link to preview

@choldgraf choldgraf changed the title Blog post about Binder and communication Blog post about frictionless reproducibility and how 2i2c could enable environments for reproducing published articles Dec 20, 2024
@choldgraf choldgraf self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
@colliand
Copy link
Contributor

I like it! Thanks for writing this up Chris. Yes, I'd be happy to co-author a version of this piece. Let's aim to collect edits and release a version in early January?

@colliand
Copy link
Contributor

colliand commented Jan 7, 2025

I will pick this up and review for publication this week.

@choldgraf
Copy link
Member Author

choldgraf commented Jan 7, 2025

Thanks @colliand - I'd like to get this published on Thursday, so that we can shift our efforts to thinking through the business model and potential pitch to HHMI. Is that realistic?

I've made some minor edits. I think the main improvement we need to make is to update the diagrams so they're a bit easier to follow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants