Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] TRD fix ccdb object time requesting [O2-3592] #1674

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bazinski
Copy link
Contributor

Fix O2-3592.

Redo the way timestamps are set for ccdb objects.
Objects now defined in the json file as a query input.

@@ -58,13 +58,10 @@
"cycleDurationSeconds": "60",
"maxNumberCycles": "-1",
"dataSource": {
"type": "direct",
"query": "digits:TRD/DIGITS;tracklets:TRD/TRACKLETS;triggers:TRD/TRKTRGRD"
"type": "direct",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aren't the json files sensitive about spaces at end of lines?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure, it worked when I went over 2 runs from catalog, 522392 and 529462. Still need to verify mc, and change dpg. dpg change will have to wait till new qc.

return;
}
}
std::cout << "done if statement for noisemap from ccdb" << std::endl;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

leftover debug statement?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops

@martenole
Copy link
Contributor

CI errors look genuine, please check

@Barthelemy
Copy link
Collaborator

There are conflicts could you check ?

@Barthelemy Barthelemy changed the title TRD fix ccdb object time requesting [O2-3592] [WIP] TRD fix ccdb object time requesting [O2-3592] Apr 5, 2023
@Barthelemy
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, @bazinski what do you want to do with this PR ? fix it or close it ?

@bazinski
Copy link
Contributor Author

bazinski commented Jul 3, 2023

Hi @Barthelemy on holiday till 12th will fix when back.

Sean

@Barthelemy
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,
What do we do here ? It has been in WIP for a very long time. Can we close it?
What do you think @martenole ?

@bazinski
Copy link
Contributor Author

bazinski commented Nov 1, 2023

@Barthelemy busy checking if its still needed.

@bazinski bazinski closed this Nov 6, 2023
@martenole
Copy link
Contributor

@bazinski why did you close this? Shouldn't we anyhow move to the DPL CCDB fetcher in all TRD tasks?

@bazinski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@martenole Indeed, it needs to be expanded, but was not working(tested last week), and the pr was touching files it never should have. I was just going to redo it all, hence closing this. Will get to it next week as per the message on mattermost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants