Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ITS - rearrangement of plots and checks for shifters #2411

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

ITS - rearrangement of plots and checks for shifters #2411

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

nicolovalle
Copy link
Contributor

In this PR:

  • The Deconding Errors vs FeeID can be checked, and it is possible to ignore multiple occurrences of the same error on the same FeeID
  • The ChipStatus task publishes an object with the fraction chips that are missing in the last N cycles, versus FeeID
    • This is passed through a checker. Different thresholds can be set for IB, ML and OL

IsakovAD
IsakovAD approved these changes Sep 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@IsakovAD IsakovAD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all is good!

@IsakovAD IsakovAD merged commit 35fe424 into AliceO2Group:master Sep 11, 2024
7 checks passed
Barthelemy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
@nicolovalle @Barthelemy
ITS - rearrangement of plots and checks for shifters (#2411)
e67e771 
* [WIP] ITS - rearrangements of plots and checks for shifters

* json typos

* Final modifications after local test

* forgotten...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@IsakovAD IsakovAD IsakovAD approved these changes

@iravasen iravasen Awaiting requested review from iravasen iravasen is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nicolovalle @IsakovAD