-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: js apps filter in enum usecase search method #1023
fix: js apps filter in enum usecase search method #1023
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 3e1d381 in 10 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/models/actions.ts:279
- Draft comment:
Ensuredata.apps
is an array before callingjoin
. This change prevents runtime errors whendata.apps
is undefined. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_GKzz1tPosmmK6QX6
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
WalkthroughThis update resolves a bug in the JavaScript SDK by refining the Changes
🔗 Related PRs
InstructionsEmoji Descriptions:
Interact with the Bot:
Execute a command using the format:
Available Commands:
Tips for Using @bot Effectively:
Need More Help?📚 Visit our documentation for detailed guides on using Entelligence.AI. |
try { | ||
const { data: res } = await apiClient.actionsV2.advancedUseCaseSearch({ | ||
query: { | ||
apps: data.apps.join(","), | ||
apps: data.apps?.join(","), | ||
limit: data.limit || undefined, | ||
filterByAvailableApps: data.filterByAvailableApps, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 Bug Fix:
Safe Access to Optional Properties
The introduction of the nullish coalescing operator ?.
to safely access the apps
array is a prudent change. This prevents potential runtime errors when apps
is undefined, enhancing the robustness of the advancedUseCaseSearch
method.
- Ensure that similar checks are applied consistently across the codebase where optional properties might be accessed.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify behavior when
apps
is undefined.
Great job on improving the code's resilience! 🚀
This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]! JS SDK Coverage Report📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL: 📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL: |
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ export class Actions { | |||
try { | |||
const { data: res } = await apiClient.actionsV2.advancedUseCaseSearch({ | |||
query: { | |||
apps: data.apps.join(","), | |||
apps: data.apps?.join(","), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good fix for handling undefined data.apps
. Consider adding a default value to handle empty string case: data.apps?.join(",") || ""
. This would prevent potential issues with the API expecting a string value.
Code Review SummaryChanges Overview
Code Quality Assessment✅ Bug Fix: The change correctly addresses the potential runtime error Suggestions for Future Improvements
Overall, this is a good fix that improves the code's robustness. The changes are minimal and focused on solving a specific issue. |
🔍 Review Summary
Purpose
advancedUseCaseSearch
method, improving the robustness of the search functionality.Key Changes
advancedUseCaseSearch
method by adding a nullish coalescing operator to safely access theapps
array, preventing runtime errors whenapps
is undefined.Impact
Original Description
No existing description found