Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: type typo and getTools w custom action #1121

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

himanshu-dixit
Copy link
Collaborator

@himanshu-dixit himanshu-dixit commented Jan 2, 2025

🔍 Review Summary

Release Note

Purpose:

  • Resolve a typographical error in SDK models to prevent runtime errors and ensure code consistency.

Changes:

  • Bug Fix: Corrected a typo in the type definition from ActionxExecuteParam to ActionExecuteParam in actions.ts.

Impact:

  • Enhances code consistency and maintainability, preventing potential runtime errors for a more reliable user experience.
Original Description

[!IMPORTANT]
Fixes a typo in type definition and updates getTools to handle custom actions.

  • Bug Fix:
    • Corrected type name from ActionxExecuteParam to ActionExecuteParam in actions.ts.
    • Updated execute() method in Actions class to use ActionExecuteParam.
  • Functionality:
    • Modified getTools() in langchain.ts to accept optional filters.
    • Updated createAction() and getTools() usage in demo.mjs and demo.ts to handle custom actions.
  • Misc:
    • Added error handling in demo.mjs and demo.ts for action creation.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 8108dd2. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.


Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
composio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 2, 2025 7:05am

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to f88c3ec in 13 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 22 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/models/actions.ts:142
  • Draft comment:
    Update the JSDoc comment to use the corrected type name.
   * @param {ActionExecuteParam} data The data for the request.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.

Workflow ID: wflow_Ydg74zZoRqQKFvYz


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

Walkthrough

This update addresses a typographical error in the actions.ts file within the SDK models. The type ActionxExecuteParam was corrected to ActionExecuteParam, ensuring consistency and accuracy in type definitions. This change is crucial for maintaining code quality and preventing potential runtime errors.

Changes

File(s) Summary
js/src/sdk/models/actions.ts Corrected a typo in the type definition from ActionxExecuteParam to ActionExecuteParam and updated its usage in the execute method signature.

🔗 Related PRs

Entelligence.ai can learn from your feedback. Simply add 👍 / 👎 emojis to teach it your preferences. More shortcuts below

Emoji Descriptions:

  • ⚠️ Potential Issue - May require further investigation.
  • 🔒 Security Vulnerability - Fix to ensure system safety.
  • 💻 Code Improvement - Suggestions to enhance code quality.
  • 🔨 Refactor Suggestion - Recommendations for restructuring code.
  • ℹ️ Others - General comments and information.

Interact with the Bot:

  • Send a message or request using the format:
    @bot + *your message*
Example: @bot Can you suggest improvements for this code?
  • Help the Bot learn by providing feedback on its responses.
    @bot + *feedback*
Example: @bot Do not comment on `save_auth` function !

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]!

JS SDK Coverage Report

📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/coverage-12578768060/coverage/index.html

📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/html-report-12578768060/html-report/report.html

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 53ad9d0 in 21 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 175 lines of code in 7 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/examples/e2e/demo.mjs:32
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency and to adhere to best practices.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The code in demo.mjs and demo.ts is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor issue but it's a good practice to end files with a newline to avoid potential issues with some tools and to adhere to POSIX standards.
2. js/examples/e2e/demo.ts:32
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency and to adhere to best practices.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The code in demo.mjs and demo.ts is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor issue but it's a good practice to end files with a newline to avoid potential issues with some tools and to adhere to POSIX standards.
3. js/src/frameworks/langchain.ts:72
  • Draft comment:
    The default value for filters in getTools is a good practice to prevent runtime errors. Ensure similar methods have consistent default values.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The getTools method in langchain.ts has been updated to provide a default value for filters. This change is beneficial as it prevents potential runtime errors when filters is not provided. However, the change should be consistent across all similar methods.
4. js/src/sdk/actionRegistry.ts:138
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure action is defined before destructuring action.metadata to prevent potential runtime errors.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 20%
    The action.metadata is being destructured without checking if action is defined. This could lead to runtime errors if action is undefined. Adding a fallback or a check would prevent such errors.
5. js/src/sdk/base.toolset.ts:144
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure action is defined before destructuring action.metadata to prevent potential runtime errors. This issue is also present in actionRegistry.ts.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 20%
    The action.metadata is being destructured without checking if action is defined. This could lead to runtime errors if action is undefined. Adding a fallback or a check would prevent such errors. This issue is also present in base.toolset.ts.

Workflow ID: wflow_2qzxtVpT6c3HJVdY


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@himanshu-dixit himanshu-dixit changed the title fix: type typo fix: type typo and getTools w custom action Jan 2, 2025
@@ -1,24 +1,32 @@
import { Composio, LangchainToolSet } from "composio-core";
import { z } from "zod";

const toolset = new LangchainToolSet();
const toolset = new LangchainToolSet({apiKey: "hwcxlkwxm3me2z6ll0ydf"});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@himanshu-dixit Should we load the API key from the env file?

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8108dd2 in 21 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 175 lines of code in 7 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/examples/e2e/demo.mjs:32
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency and to adhere to best practices.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The code in js/examples/e2e/demo.mjs and js/examples/e2e/demo.ts is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor issue but it's a good practice to end files with a newline to avoid potential issues with some tools and to adhere to POSIX standards.
2. js/examples/e2e/demo.ts:32
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency and to adhere to best practices.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 10%
    The code in js/examples/e2e/demo.mjs and js/examples/e2e/demo.ts is missing a newline at the end of the file. This is a minor issue but it's a good practice to end files with a newline to avoid potential issues with some tools and to adhere to POSIX standards.
3. js/src/frameworks/langchain.ts:73
  • Draft comment:
    Consider providing a default value for entityId to maintain consistency with other methods and improve code readability.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 20%
    The getTools method in js/src/frameworks/langchain.ts has a default parameter for filters but not for entityId. It would be more consistent to also provide a default value for entityId, similar to how it's done in the ComposioToolSet class.
4. js/src/sdk/actionRegistry.ts:138
  • Draft comment:
    Good use of action.metadata || {} to safely destructure callback and toolName.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    In js/src/sdk/actionRegistry.ts, the executeAction method uses action.metadata || {} to destructure callback and toolName. This is a good practice to avoid runtime errors if metadata is undefined.
5. js/src/sdk/base.toolset.ts:141
  • Draft comment:
    Consider providing a default value for the filters parameter to enhance robustness and prevent potential issues if undefined is passed.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 20%
    In js/src/sdk/base.toolset.ts, the getToolsSchema method uses optional chaining and nullish coalescing operators effectively. However, the filters parameter is not given a default value, which could lead to issues if undefined is passed. Providing a default value would enhance robustness.

Workflow ID: wflow_GZPa42NWis89IGnn


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Comment on lines 141 to +148
const toolsWithCustomActions = (
await this.userActionRegistry.getAllActions()
).filter((action) => {
const { actionName, toolName } = action.metadata;
const { name: actionName, toolName } = action.metadata || {};
return (
(!filters.actions ||
filters.actions.some(
(name) => name.toLowerCase() === actionName!.toLowerCase()
(name) => name.toLowerCase() === actionName?.toLowerCase()

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug Fix: The current code introduces a potential logical error by using optional chaining with destructuring. This can lead to undefined values being destructured if action.metadata is null or undefined, potentially causing runtime errors.

Actionable Suggestions:

  • Ensure action.metadata is checked for null or undefined before destructuring.
  • Alternatively, provide default values during destructuring to prevent runtime errors.

This will ensure that the code handles cases where action.metadata might not be present, thus avoiding unexpected behavior or crashes.

🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- const { name: actionName, toolName } = action.metadata || {};
+ const { name: actionName = '', toolName = '' } = action.metadata || {};
📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
const toolsWithCustomActions = (
await this.userActionRegistry.getAllActions()
).filter((action) => {
const { actionName, toolName } = action.metadata;
const { name: actionName, toolName } = action.metadata || {};
return (
(!filters.actions ||
filters.actions.some(
(name) => name.toLowerCase() === actionName!.toLowerCase()
(name) => name.toLowerCase() === actionName?.toLowerCase()
const toolsWithCustomActions = (await this.userActionRegistry.getAllActions()).filter((action) => {
const { name: actionName = '', toolName = '' } = action.metadata || {};
return (
(!filters.actions ||
filters.actions.some(
(name) => name.toLowerCase() === actionName.toLowerCase() ||
name.toLowerCase() === toolName.toLowerCase()
)
)
);
});

Comment on lines 24 to 31
}),
response: z.record(z.any()),
metadata: z.object({
actionName: z.string(),
toolName: z.string(),
name: z.string(),
toolName: z.string().optional(),
}),
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Potential Issue: The change from actionName to name and making toolName optional can introduce logical errors if not handled properly across the codebase. This could lead to inconsistencies, especially if other parts of the code expect these fields to be present and named as before.

Actionable Steps:

  • Codebase Review: Conduct a thorough review of the codebase to identify all instances where actionName and toolName are used. Update these references to align with the new structure.
  • Update Logic: Ensure that any logic relying on toolName being present is updated to handle cases where it might be undefined. Consider using default values or conditional checks.
  • Testing: Implement comprehensive testing to verify that the changes do not break existing functionality and that all edge cases are handled.

Code Suggestion:

Consider adding comments or documentation to highlight these changes for future reference and to aid other developers in understanding the new structure.


@himanshu-dixit himanshu-dixit merged commit 27df7e5 into master Jan 2, 2025
13 checks passed
@himanshu-dixit himanshu-dixit deleted the ft-fix-type-typo branch January 2, 2025 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants