Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade @opentelemetry/sdk-node from 0.42.0 to 0.43.0 #417

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

krischarbonneau
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @opentelemetry/sdk-node from 0.42.0 to 0.43.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2023-09-12.
Release notes
Package name: @opentelemetry/sdk-node
  • 0.43.0 - 2023-09-12

    Experimental 0.43.0

    🐛 (Bug Fix)

    • Revert "feat(api): add attributes argument to recordException API #4071"
      • This feature was an unintentional breaking change introduced with API 1.5.0
      • This PR updates all experimental packages to allow API 1.6.0, where this change has been reverted.
  • 0.42.0 - 2023-09-11

    Experimental 0.42.0

    Warning
    This release widened the range of the API peer dependency to include@ opentelemetry/api@1.5.x, which introduced an unintentional breaking change. This change was rolled back in https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/releases/tag/experimental%2Fv0.43.0.

    💥 Breaking Change

    • chore(sdk-node): deprecate methods in favor of constructor options #3996 @ pichlermarc
      • The following methods are now deprecated and will be removed in 0.43.0
        • NodeSDK.configureTracerProvider(), please use constructor options instead
        • NodeSDK.configureMeterProvider(), please use constructor options instead
        • NodeSDK.configureLoggerProvider(), please use constructor options instead
        • NodeSDK.addResource(), please use constructor options instead
        • NodeSDK.detectResources(), this is not necessary anymore, resources are now auto-detected on startup.
    • chore(sdk-node): add notice that '@ opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger' has to be installed manually in the next version #4068 @ pichlermarc
      • Starting with 0.43.0 '@ opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger' will no longer be a dependency of this package. To continue using '@ opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger', please install it manually.
        • NOTE: @ opentelemetry/exporter-jaeger is deprecated, consider switching to one of the alternatives described here

    🚀 (Enhancement)

    • feat: update PeriodicExportingMetricReader and PrometheusExporter to accept optional metric producers #4077 @ aabmass

    🐛 (Bug Fix)

    • fix(exporter-logs-otlp-http): add @ opentelemetry/api-logs as dependency
from @opentelemetry/sdk-node GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: @opentelemetry/sdk-node
  • faf939c chore: release API 1.6.0/SDK 1.17.0/Experimental 0.43.0 (#4138)
  • 27897d6 Revert "feat(api): add attributes argument to recordException API (#4071)" (#4137)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@krischarbonneau krischarbonneau requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2023 14:38
@github-actions
Copy link

Signed-off-by: Benoit Cloutier <benoit.bc.cloutier@gmail.com>
@nibivi77 nibivi77 self-requested a review November 1, 2023 17:36
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cloutier <benoit.bc.cloutier@gmail.com>
@nibivi77 nibivi77 merged commit 5a0bb06 into dev Nov 6, 2023
7 checks passed
@nibivi77 nibivi77 deleted the snyk-upgrade-a329035341fcae5b59a8eb9a737c18e2 branch November 6, 2023 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants