Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/get targets
refactor #788/get targets
refactor #788Changes from 9 commits
d8f092d
88c69f6
d3dc507
5b1efbd
c9e2ae9
89cb821
f6d5c46
8a26063
29c7519
79fe2bd
4dddff8
b0f3d26
e761737
9c146b6
42534d5
bdde587
85e0687
20e617a
5f4c1b5
a89d63c
c78510f
635ecd1
f22ea53
59a5c2f
0624b6c
b9f80c9
2ade622
b3e8b21
281c6d9
bfe4a77
bc03723
945e01e
f175de3
fbd0b1c
707f4f9
7161384
082b070
b6d1470
47cabd5
5f4460a
6015453
0a82700
31b8d82
25a812a
4dfaf89
73d74d9
d4f6f96
cf43299
9aeba90
38bdb83
421b636
8972ef8
8926de3
c4182ea
f85fc62
ceae28e
5b11ed7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
worth confirming, but i think
pydantic.BaseModel
automatically defines this and__eq__
so we don't need toThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it does define
__repr__
but its formatting looks like this (i.e., without the newlines from the dedicated one which I guess takes up more space):It does also handle the
__eq__
, I just had an assertion error in one of my earlier tests that was fixed by adding an__eq__
but that's not an issue anymore, so it's removed now.