Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add helper for background events #2974

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

Add helper for background events #2974

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

hmalik88
Copy link
Contributor

@hmalik88 hmalik88 commented Dec 24, 2024

Added new helper onBackgroundEvent which is an alias of the onCronjob helper. Updated the cronjob example snap's tests as well.

@hmalik88 hmalik88 marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2024 04:38
@hmalik88 hmalik88 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 24, 2024 04:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.71%. Comparing base (296244d) to head (c7d4a0b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2974   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.71%   94.71%           
=======================================
  Files         497      497           
  Lines       10802    10802           
  Branches     1649     1649           
=======================================
  Hits        10231    10231           
  Misses        571      571           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hmalik88 hmalik88 merged commit a342b7e into main Jan 6, 2025
166 checks passed
@hmalik88 hmalik88 deleted the hm/jest-background-events branch January 6, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants