Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sell的基礎介面 #126

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

sell的基礎介面 #126

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

AnaAngle
Copy link

@AnaAngle AnaAngle commented Nov 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new route for adding sales functionality at /sales/add_sell.
    • Added a React component for managing sales, featuring a user interface with search functionality and category filters.
  • Dependencies

    • Updated tailwindcss dependency version from ^3.4.10 to ^3.4.14.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the project by modifying the package.json to upgrade the tailwindcss dependency version from ^3.4.10 to ^3.4.14. Additionally, it adds a new sales route for adding sales functionality, including the creation of a React component in add_sell.tsx. This component features an authentication guard, a loader for fetching sales data, and a user interface for displaying sales items.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated tailwindcss version from ^3.4.10 to ^3.4.14.
src/routeTree.gen.ts Added SalesAddsellRoute for path /sales/add_sell, updated routing interfaces, and incorporated the new route.
src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx Introduced a new React component EventSale for adding sales, with authentication guard and sales data loader.

Poem

In the meadow where sales bloom bright,
A new route hops into the light.
With tailwind's grace, our styles align,
Adding features, oh how they shine!
Through the code, we dance and play,
Celebrating changes, hip-hip-hooray! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c55448 and 78d3d14.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/routeTree.gen.ts (13 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/routeTree.gen.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-350: LGTM! The route integration appears consistent.

The new /sales/add_sell route has been properly integrated into all necessary sections of the router configuration:

  • Import statement
  • Route definition
  • Interface declarations
  • Route manifest

Since this is an auto-generated file by TanStack Router, the changes follow the expected structure.

Let's verify the route integration is complete and consistent:

✅ Verification successful

Route integration verified successfully

The verification confirms:

  • The route component exists at src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx
  • The route path /sales/add_sell follows the same nested path pattern as other similar routes (e.g., /home/infoCard, /events/create)
  • The parent route relationship is consistent with all other routes (using rootRoute)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the route integration and related components

# Test 1: Verify the route component exists
fd "add_sell.tsx" "src/routes"

# Test 2: Check if the route follows the same pattern as other routes
rg -A 1 "path: '/\w+/[^/]+'" "src/routeTree.gen.ts"

# Test 3: Verify parent route relationship
rg "getParentRoute: \(\) => \w+Route" "src/routeTree.gen.ts"

Length of output: 1084


70-74: Consider route organization and security implications.

A few architectural considerations for the sales feature:

  1. Route Organization: The /sales/add_sell path follows a RESTful pattern. Consider if other sales-related routes (edit, view, list) will follow the same pattern.
  2. Security: Ensure that the component at sales/add_sell.tsx implements proper authentication and authorization checks since it's a data modification endpoint.
  3. Navigation: Consider how this route fits into the overall navigation structure and user flow of the sales feature.

Let's verify the security implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Route organization and security implementation verified

The codebase shows a consistent and secure implementation:

  • Authentication is properly implemented using AuthGuard which checks for valid sessions and redirects to login if needed
  • The route follows the established pattern seen in other feature routes (events, calendar, dinner)
  • All sensitive routes consistently use beforeLoad: AuthGuard for protection
  • The sales routes are properly organized under the /sales namespace

The architectural concerns raised in the review are already addressed in the implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for authentication/authorization implementation

# Test 1: Check for auth guard usage
rg -A 5 "AuthGuard|useAuth|isAuthenticated" "src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx"

# Test 2: Check for role-based access control
rg -A 5 "role|permission|canAccess" "src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx"

Length of output: 457


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the route organization and security patterns more thoroughly

# Check for other sales-related routes and their patterns
rg -l "path.*sales.*" src/

# Check the auth guard implementation
rg -A 10 "export.*AuthGuard" src/

# Check if there's a consistent pattern for protected routes
rg -A 5 "beforeLoad.*AuthGuard" src/

# Look for role-based checks in auth utilities
rg -A 5 "role|permission|isAdmin" src/utils/auth.ts

Length of output: 2985


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx (2)

100-102: Replace generic circles with semantic icons

The BasicIcon components are currently rendering simple circles. Consider using more meaningful icons for search and filter functionality.

<BasicIcon size={24}>
-  <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="14" />
+  <path d="M15.5 14h-.79l-.28-.27C15.41 12.59 16 11.11 16 9.5 16 5.91 13.09 3 9.5 3S3 5.91 3 9.5 5.91 16 9.5 16c1.61 0 3.09-.59 4.23-1.57l.27.28v.79l5 4.99L20.49 19l-4.99-5zm-6 0C7.01 14 5 11.99 5 9.5S7.01 5 9.5 5 14 7.01 14 9.5 11.99 14 9.5 14z"/> <!-- Search icon -->
</BasicIcon>

Also applies to: 104-106


38-54: Improve responsive grid layout

The current grid implementation might have issues on different screen sizes:

  • Fixed percentage widths might not work well on mobile devices
  • No media queries for different breakpoints

Consider using Tailwind's grid utilities:

-grid: {
-  padding: '10px',
-  display: 'flex',
-  flexWrap: 'wrap',
-  gap: '10px',
-  justifyContent: 'space-between',
-},
+className="grid grid-cols-1 sm:grid-cols-2 md:grid-cols-3 lg:grid-cols-4 gap-4 p-4"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7134cae and 4223347.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .env (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/routeTree.gen.ts (13 hunks)
  • src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
.env

2-2: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/routeTree.gen.ts (2)

21-21: LGTM: Route definition is properly structured.

The new route for sales functionality is correctly imported and defined with proper parent route configuration.

Also applies to: 63-67


122-128: Verify route path consistency with existing sales routes.

The new route /sales/add_sell is consistently defined across all interfaces. However, let's verify its alignment with existing sales routes for consistent URL structure.

Also applies to: 175-175, 189-189, 204-204, 220-220, 233-233, 246-246, 261-261, 275-275, 300-300, 323-325

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the route structure.

Route path /sales/add_sell follows consistent URL structure

The route path follows the existing sales route structure, being properly nested under /sales/. The search results show that:

  • The parent route is consistently defined as /sales/
  • The new route /sales/add_sell is consistently referenced across route definitions
  • No other add/create patterns were found in other routes, making this the first such route under sales
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent URL structure in sales routes

# Search for all sales-related route definitions
echo "Checking sales route patterns..."
rg -A 1 "'/sales/" src/routeTree.gen.ts

# Search for any other add/create patterns in routes
echo "Checking other add/create patterns..."
rg -A 1 "/(add|create)/" src/routeTree.gen.ts

Length of output: 1100

src/routes/sales/add_sell.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +93 to +127
function EventSale() {
const { sales } = Route.useLoaderData()
return (
<>
<Header />
<div style={styles.container}>
<div style={styles.searchSection}>
<BasicIcon size={24}>
<circle cx="12" cy="12" r="14" />
</BasicIcon>
<input style={styles.searchInput} placeholder="搜尋" />
<BasicIcon size={24}>
<circle cx="12" cy="12" r="14" />
</BasicIcon>
</div>
<div style={styles.categories}>
<button style={styles.categoryButton}>全部</button>
<button style={styles.categoryButton}>五金</button>
<button style={styles.categoryButton}>飲料</button>
<button style={styles.categoryButton}>贈品</button>
</div>
<div style={styles.grid}>
{
sales.map((p) => (
<div key={p.id} style={styles.card}>
<h1 style={styles.productName}>{p.product}</h1>
<p style={styles.productInfo}>價格: {p.price} 元</p>
</div>
))
}
</div>
</div>
</>
)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement search functionality and add TypeScript types

The component has several areas for improvement:

  • Search input is non-functional
  • Category buttons are hardcoded without filtering logic
  • Missing TypeScript type definitions

Consider implementing these improvements:

interface Sale {
  id: string;
  product: string;
  price: number;
  category: string;
}

function EventSale() {
  const { sales } = Route.useLoaderData()
  const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState('')
  const [selectedCategory, setSelectedCategory] = useState('all')

  const filteredSales = sales.filter((sale: Sale) => {
    const matchesSearch = sale.product.toLowerCase().includes(searchTerm.toLowerCase())
    const matchesCategory = selectedCategory === 'all' || sale.category === selectedCategory
    return matchesSearch && matchesCategory
  })

  return (
    // ... existing JSX with updated handlers
    <input 
      value={searchTerm}
      onChange={(e) => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)}
      style={styles.searchInput} 
      placeholder="搜尋" 
    />
    // ... rest of the component
  )
}

Comment on lines +115 to +122
{
sales.map((p) => (
<div key={p.id} style={styles.card}>
<h1 style={styles.productName}>{p.product}</h1>
<p style={styles.productInfo}>價格: {p.price} 元</p>
</div>
))
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add loading and error states

The sales data rendering doesn't handle loading or error states, which could lead to poor user experience.

Add proper state handling:

function EventSale() {
  const { sales } = Route.useLoaderData()
+ const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true)

+ if (isLoading) {
+   return <div>Loading sales data...</div>
+ }

+ if (!sales?.length) {
+   return <div>No sales data available</div>
+ }

  return (
    // ... existing JSX
  )
}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +81 to +90
loader: async () => {
const { data, error } = await supabase
.from('sales')
.select('*')
if (error !== null) {
throw error
}

return { sales: data }
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement pagination and improve error handling

The current data fetching implementation has several potential issues:

  • Fetching all sales records at once could impact performance
  • Generic error handling might not be user-friendly

Consider implementing pagination and better error handling:

loader: async () => {
+ const PAGE_SIZE = 20;
  const { data, error } = await supabase
    .from('sales')
    .select('*')
+   .range(0, PAGE_SIZE - 1)
+   .order('created_at', { ascending: false })
  if (error !== null) {
-   throw error
+   throw new Error(`Failed to fetch sales: ${error.message}`)
  }

- return { sales: data }
+ return { 
+   sales: data,
+   hasMore: data.length === PAGE_SIZE
+ }
}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@1989ONCE 1989ONCE added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2024
@1989ONCE 1989ONCE self-requested a review December 3, 2024 12:07
Copy link
Member

@1989ONCE 1989ONCE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please make sure to pass the type check and do not commit .env file onto the main branch, thx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants