[SPARK-45283][CORE][TESTS] Make StatusTrackerSuite less fragile

### Why are the changes needed?

It's discovered from [Github Actions](https://github.com/xiongbo-sjtu/spark/actions/runs/6270601155/job/17028788767) that StatusTrackerSuite can run into random failures, as shown by the following error message.  The proposed fix is to update the unit test to remove the nondeterministic behavior.

```
    [info] StatusTrackerSuite:
    [info] - basic status API usage (99 milliseconds)
    [info] - getJobIdsForGroup() (56 milliseconds)
    [info] - getJobIdsForGroup() with takeAsync() (48 milliseconds)
    [info] - getJobIdsForGroup() with takeAsync() across multiple partitions (58 milliseconds)
    [info] - getJobIdsForTag() *** FAILED *** (10 seconds, 77 milliseconds)
    [info] The code passed to eventually never returned normally.
           Attempted 651 times over 10.005059944000001 seconds.
           Last failure message: Set(3, 2, 1) was not equal to Set(1, 2). (StatusTrackerSuite.scala:148)
```

Full trace can be found [here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45283).

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
```
build/mvn package -DskipTests -pl core
build/mvn -Dtest=none -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.StatusTrackerSuite test
```

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes #43194 from xiongbo-sjtu/master.

Authored-by: Bo Xiong <xiongbo@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Mridul Muralidharan <mridul<at>gmail.com>

core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/StatusTrackerSuite.scala

@@ -140,16 +140,19 @@ class StatusTrackerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with Matchers with LocalSparkCont
     }
 
     sc.removeJobTag("tag1")
+
     // takeAsync() across multiple partitions
     val thirdJobFuture = sc.parallelize(1 to 1000, 2).takeAsync(999)
-    val thirdJobId = eventually(timeout(10.seconds)) {
-      thirdJobFuture.jobIds.head
+    val thirdJobIds = eventually(timeout(10.seconds)) {
+      // Wait for the two jobs triggered by takeAsync
+      thirdJobFuture.jobIds.size should be(2)
+      thirdJobFuture.jobIds
     }
     eventually(timeout(10.seconds)) {
       sc.statusTracker.getJobIdsForTag("tag1").toSet should be (
         Set(firstJobId, secondJobId))
       sc.statusTracker.getJobIdsForTag("tag2").toSet should be (
-        Set(secondJobId, thirdJobId))
+        Set(secondJobId) ++ thirdJobIds)
     }
   }
 }