-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error when JSON/YAML parsing would set property default
in a Dynamic
#700
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
8a2b659
to
109101e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! Just some comments about error messages.
CC @holzensp @stackoverflow; merging this is a breaking change.
pkl-core/src/main/java/org/pkl/core/stdlib/json/ParserNodes.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkl-core/src/main/java/org/pkl/core/stdlib/yaml/ParserNodes.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM; pending thumbs from @stackoverflow and @holzensp
pkl-core/src/main/java/org/pkl/core/stdlib/json/ParserNodes.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkl-core/src/main/java/org/pkl/core/stdlib/yaml/ParserNodes.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -469,6 +473,13 @@ private void addMembers(MappingNode node, VmObject object) { | |||
var memberName = | |||
convertedKey instanceof String string && !useMapping ? Identifier.get(string) : null; | |||
|
|||
// https://github.com/apple/pkl/issues/561 | |||
if (memberName != null && "default".equals(convertedKey)) { | |||
throw new ParseException( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All other error handling code in this file throws YamlEngineException
, which is caught in the same file and translated to VmException
. Why throw a custom exception here, only to duplicate the code that translates to VmException
? (I know this was suggested in the review, but I don't see the point.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
YamlEngineException
doesn't feel like the right class to throw our own errors with tailored messages. I think the direction we should move here is to switch all of our own throws from YamlEngineException
to org.pkl.core.util.yaml.ParseException
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Throwing ParseException everywhere is an improvement. But since these exceptions are implementation details and thrown and caught in the same file, introducing your own exception feels unnecessary (adds code for no benefit).
json.ParserNodes follows the same pattern: It throws org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException, which also isn't your own exception.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the extra class seems needlessly verbose and that we should probably move away from YamlEngineException
s. I don't quite understand org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException
not being "your own exception." What do you mean by that, @translatenix?
Is there any reason not to move org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException
up one level (into util
) and use it for either?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea is that errors coming from ParseException
can be presented to users as-is; because they are already tailored to be presented as error messages.
YamlEngineException
messages come from SnakeYAML, and should be decorated with a generic "malformed yaml" message.
I think a good north star here is to not surface messages from YamlEngineException
at all, and instead present all parse errors as our own tailored error messages. But, for now, it's helpful to have two different exception classes so we know what comes from us, and what comes from our parser library.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't quite understand org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException not being "your own exception." What do you mean by that, @translatenix?
org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException
comes from the external JSON library that was copied into Pkl's codebase. As such it's the equivalent of YamlEngineException
.
YamlEngineException messages come from SnakeYAML, and should be decorated with a generic "malformed yaml" message.
If that's what you want, having your own exception makes sense, assuming you can't throw a VmException
to begin with. You may want to make the same change for json/ParserNodes
.
e5504b5
to
ed92c3e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nits, but no strong objections. Approving to unblock; exception discussion is worth seeing through, but we can also follow up.
pkl-core/src/main/resources/org/pkl/core/errorMessages.properties
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkl-core/src/main/resources/org/pkl/core/errorMessages.properties
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pkl-core/src/main/resources/org/pkl/core/errorMessages.properties
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -469,6 +473,13 @@ private void addMembers(MappingNode node, VmObject object) { | |||
var memberName = | |||
convertedKey instanceof String string && !useMapping ? Identifier.get(string) : null; | |||
|
|||
// https://github.com/apple/pkl/issues/561 | |||
if (memberName != null && "default".equals(convertedKey)) { | |||
throw new ParseException( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the extra class seems needlessly verbose and that we should probably move away from YamlEngineException
s. I don't quite understand org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException
not being "your own exception." What do you mean by that, @translatenix?
Is there any reason not to move org.pkl.core.util.json.ParseException
up one level (into util
) and use it for either?
f5f96df
to
13e3306
Compare
Co-authored-by: Philip K.F. Hölzenspies <holzensp@gmail.com>
13e3306
to
9ee33e3
Compare
Resolves #561