Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deps(client): update to camunda-bpmn-js@4.5.1 #4255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged

deps(client): update to camunda-bpmn-js@4.5.1 #4255

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

marstamm
Copy link
Member

closes #4220

@marstamm marstamm requested a review from a team April 22, 2024 07:43
@marstamm marstamm self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@marstamm marstamm requested review from philippfromme and barmac and removed request for a team April 22, 2024 07:43
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot added the needs review Review pending label Apr 22, 2024
@marstamm marstamm mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Closed
2 tasks
nikku
nikku approved these changes Apr 22, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@nikku nikku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Works.

@marstamm marstamm merged commit f5264b4 into develop Apr 22, 2024
15 checks passed
@marstamm marstamm deleted the 4220-bump-camunda-bpmn-js branch April 22, 2024 08:09
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot removed the needs review Review pending label Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nikku nikku nikku approved these changes

@philippfromme philippfromme Awaiting requested review from philippfromme philippfromme was automatically assigned from camunda/modeling-dev

@barmac barmac Awaiting requested review from barmac barmac was automatically assigned from camunda/modeling-dev

Assignees

@marstamm marstamm

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Insufficient validation of example data provided for a BPMN process
2 participants
@marstamm @nikku