feat: update default changelog titles

[paduszyk]

Description

This updates the default titles of the changelog's sections in ConventionalCommitsCz.

Checklist

• Add test cases to all the changes you introduce
• Run ./scripts/format and ./scripts/test locally to ensure this change passes linter check and test
• Test the changes on the local machine manually
• Update the documentation for the changes

Expected behavior

Changelogs are more human-readable.

Additional context

Closes #1119.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.57%. Comparing base (120d514) to head (34543d5).
Report is 471 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1143      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.33%   97.57%   +0.24%     
==========================================
  Files          42       55      +13     
  Lines        2104     2603     +499     
==========================================
+ Hits         2048     2540     +492     
- Misses         56       63       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	97.57% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[woile]

Why are the tests using the old format?

[paduszyk]

I did not want to change the tests. So I applied mocking instead to hard-coding the new values.

IMHO: For tests, the names should not matter, I guess. The point is what the values are actually used for.

[Lee-W]

It might be a bit confusing as these are no longer the actual default_change_type_map when someone's tracing the test cases, they might be misled

[Lee-W]

@paduszyk Hi, would it be possible for us to address #1119 (comment). I think we're really close to merging!

[noirbizarre]

I would flag this change as breaking as it means any user having a custom change_type_order with the default change_type_map will see its changelog broken without a manual intervention (aka. updating the change_type_order with the new names).
So maybe should include this one in the next major (v4?) ?

[Lee-W]

I would flag this change as breaking as it means any user having a custom change_type_order with the default change_type_map will see its changelog broken without a manual intervention (aka. updating the change_type_order with the new names). So maybe should include this one in the next major (v4?) ?

Sounds good! Let me add the label

[Lee-W]

I think we need to change the test cases