Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

skip longest running tests for pypy on aarch #207

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

h-vetinari
Copy link
Member

Hopefully less flaky than after #204

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@h-vetinari
Copy link
Member Author

@mattip, the following error in windows is flaky (and it's the first time I see it), but just FYI:

================================== FAILURES ===================================
_________________________________ test_seterr _________________________________
[gw1] win32 -- Python 3.8.13 %PREFIX%\python.exe
..\_test_env\lib\site-packages\scipy\special\tests\test_sf_error.py:64: in test_seterr
    _check_action(_sf_error_test_function, (error_code,), action)
        action     = 'warn'
        category   = 'no_result'
        entry_err  = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'ignore', 'no_result': 'ignore', ...}
        error_code = 6
        geterr_olderr = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'other': 'ignore', ...}
        newerr     = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'other': 'ignore', ...}
        seterr_olderr = {'arg': 'ignore', 'domain': 'ignore', 'loss': 'raise', 'no_result': 'ignore', ...}
..\_test_env\lib\site-packages\scipy\special\tests\test_sf_error.py:33: in _check_action
    fun(*args)
E   scipy.special._sf_error.SpecialFunctionError: scipy.special/_sf_error_test_function: (underflow) floating point underflow
        action     = 'warn'
        args       = (6,)
        fun        = <ufunc '_sf_error_test_function'>

@mattip
Copy link
Contributor

mattip commented Jul 26, 2022

☹️

@h-vetinari
Copy link
Member Author

☹️

It's not that bad. It seems rare enough that I don't mind restarting builds to get past it. In terms of priority (from the POV of this feedstock), the 1.9 stuff is more important (and I believe more tractable too).

@h-vetinari h-vetinari marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2022 23:07
@h-vetinari h-vetinari merged commit f8a1a66 into conda-forge:main Jul 26, 2022
@h-vetinari h-vetinari deleted the time branch July 26, 2022 23:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants