fix: Transport log should return string type #99
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow, README, and TypeScript type definitions. The changes include adding a Codecov token to the CI workflow, inserting a Node.js version badge in the README, and updating the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant CI
participant Codecov
Developer->>CI: Push code changes
CI->>Codecov: Send coverage report
Codecov->>Developer: Generate coverage insights
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
index.test-d.ts (1)
43-46: Consider adding more type test casesWhile the current tests verify the basic functionality, consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases with optional meta parameter
- Different LoggerLevel values
- Array argument types
Example additions:
// Test with meta parameter expectType<string>(transport.log('INFO', [], { level: 'INFO', date: '', pid: 0, hostname: '', message: '', raw: false })); // Test with different log levels expectType<string>(transport.log('DEBUG', [])); expectType<string>(transport.log('ERROR', [])); // Test with various argument types expectType<string>(transport.log('INFO', [new Error('test')])); expectType<string>(transport.log('INFO', ['message', { data: 1 }]));.github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1)
17-18: Consider moving Codecov token addition to a separate PRThe addition of the Codecov token, while valuable, is unrelated to the Transport.log return type change. Consider moving this to a separate PR to maintain clear change history and easier rollback if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)index.d.ts(1 hunks)index.test-d.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
index.d.ts (1)
224-224:
Breaking Change: Transport.log() now returns string
This change modifies the return type of the log method from void to string, which is a breaking change that may affect existing code. While code that ignores the return value will continue to work, any code that explicitly types the return value as void will need updates.
Let's verify the impact of this change:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Breaking Change Verified: Transport.log() Return Type Change is Intentional
The return type change from void to string is a deliberate and necessary change, as evidenced by:
- The
FileTransportimplementation uses the return value:const buf = super.log(level, args, meta); - The
ConsoleTransportimplementation also uses the return value:const msg = super.log(level, args, meta); - Type tests explicitly verify string return:
expectType<string>(transport.log('ALL', []));
The change appears to be correctly implemented across the codebase with all derived classes properly handling the return value. No instances of problematic usage were found where the return value was typed as void.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any code that might be affected by the Transport.log return type change
# Look for assignments or direct usage of Transport.log results
# Search for Transport.log usage patterns
rg -A 2 "transport\.log\("
# Search for class extensions of Transport
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Transport {
$$$
log($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 8359
index.test-d.ts (1)
3-6: LGTM: Import changes look good
The addition of Transport and LoggerLevel imports is appropriate for the new type tests.
[skip ci] ## [3.6.1](v3.6.0...v3.6.1) (2024-12-22) ### Bug Fixes * Transport log should return string type ([#99](#99)) ([fe6b496](fe6b496))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
logmethod in theTransportclass to return a string, enhancing its functionality.Chores
CODECOV_TOKENfor improved code coverage reporting.TransportandLoggerLevel.