TypedRecord: Add field access #994
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
badcel
force-pushed
the
typed-record-field-access
branch
from
f7e1ff4 to
8992974
Compare
badcel
force-pushed
the
typed-record-field-access
branch
5 times, most recently
from
2d98432 to
f35e4b7
Compare
badcel
force-pushed
the
typed-record-field-access
branch
from
f35e4b7 to
bd0856d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I agree that my contribution may be licensed either under MIT or any version of LGPL license.
Add test for Enumeration
Add test for bitfield
Add test for String.
add test for
/* <private> */(verify field is present in struct but missing in public api)