forked from Alexpux/Cygwin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some backports from 3.4 #61
Merged
dscho
merged 10 commits into
git-for-windows:msys2-gfw-3.3-branch
from
dscho:some-backports-from-3.4
Nov 29, 2023
Merged
Some backports from 3.4 #61
dscho
merged 10 commits into
git-for-windows:msys2-gfw-3.3-branch
from
dscho:some-backports-from-3.4
Nov 29, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As mentioned in https://github.blog/changelog/2022-09-22-github-actions-all-actions-will-begin-running-on-node16-instead-of-node12/ GitHub workflows should avoid using Actions that use Node.js 12 and instead upgrade to versions of those Actions that use Node.js 16. So let's do that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
We only build once in CI, so dependency tracking isn't needed. This saves 3-4 minutes in CI.
We just disabled the code that skips environment variables whose values are empty. However, this code was introduced a long time ago into Cygwin in d6b1ac7 (* environ.cc (build_env): Don't put an empty environment variable into the environment. Optimize use of "len". * errno.cc (ERROR_MORE_DATA): Translate to EMSGSIZE rather than EAGAIN., 2006-09-07), seemingly without any complaints. Meaning: There might very well be use cases out there where it makes sense to skip empty-valued environment variables. Therefore, it seems like a good idea to have a "knob" to turn it back on. With this commit, we introduce such a knob: by setting `noemptyenvvalues` the `MSYS` variable (or appending it if that variable is already set), users can tell the MSYS2 runtime to behave just like in the olden times. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
With this commit, you can call MSYS=noemptyenvvalues my-command and it does what is expected: to pass no empty-valued environment variables to `my-command`. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
When calling `cygpath -u C:/msys64/` in an MSYS2 setup that was installed into `C:/msys64/`, the result should be `/`, not `//`. Let's ensure that we do not append another trailing slash if the converted path already ends in a slash. This fixes msys2/msys2-runtime#112 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
…nvironment variables to Windows form for native Win32 applications. Don't memchr behind end, it+1
…nvironment variables to Windows form for native Win32 applications. Don't memchr behind end, it2
This solves redefinition of FILE_CS_FLAG_CASE_SENSITIVE_DIR in winnt.h and fixes the following compiler errors ntdll.h:523:3: error: expected identifier before numeric constant 523 | FILE_CS_FLAG_CASE_SENSITIVE_DIR = 0x01 | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ntdll.h:522:1: note: to match this ‘{’ 522 | { | ^ (cherry picked from commit 3bee682)
GCC 13 (and maybe 12, too), warn about pointers used after `free()`. In `nlsfuncs.cc`, they are used on purpose, though, in `rebase_locale_buf()`, to adjust pointers that were invalidated because of a `realloc()` (not a `free()`, actually). So let's shush GCC about those instances. However, we must be careful only to do that with GCC >= 12 because older versions would complain about an unknown warning... Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
dscho
force-pushed
the
some-backports-from-3.4
branch
from
November 25, 2023 01:45
14f0a28
to
09fa455
Compare
Whoopsie. I meant to merge this before git-for-windows/MSYS2-packages#138. |
This is something I have thought about for msys2/msys2-runtime. MSYS2 does still have https://packages.msys2.org/base/msys2-runtime-3.3. Would it make sense to do this "upstream" too? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After merging git-for-windows/MSYS2-packages#136, I realized that we had not kept the v3.3 branch up to date. So I went through the range-diff between the v3.3 and the v3.4 patches and cherry-picked anything from the latter that struck me as needing to be backported to the former.