-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update checking-for-existing-gpg-keys.md #35597
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add a workaround for the “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error.
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
Automatically generated comment ℹ️This comment is automatically generated and will be overwritten every time changes are committed to this branch. The table contains an overview of files in the Content directory changesYou may find it useful to copy this table into the pull request summary. There you can edit it to share links to important articles or changes and to give a high-level overview of how the changes in your pull request support the overall goals of the pull request.
fpt: Free, Pro, Team |
@hemashushu Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ |
I am providing two public key files for testing: $ gpg --import --import-options show-only hippospark.public.asc
pub rsa2048 2013-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2050-03-27]
AC1F548ADA01B4770A7C5B0E240CA6A5BDAF9022
sub rsa2048 2013-04-15 [E] [expires: 2050-03-27]
sub rsa2048 2013-05-14 [S] [expires: 2050-03-27] |
Thanks for opening a pull request! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀 |
Add a workaround for the “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error.
Why:
Users may encounter “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error when importing larger GPG public keys. This is because some users have been using GPG for a long time and the public key contains more signature information. The original documentation does not indicate why this error is encountered and does not provide a workaround.
What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
The following paragraph was added: