feat: add fuegoecho alpha for #260 #304 parity #327
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for this amazing PR! Looks promising. I'll look more into it in a few days, I'm far from home (and my computer) for a few days for New Year's eve. Thanks again! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey all,
I'm an labstack/echo user and wanted to make use of the cool OpenAPI go generics in Fuego. I didn't want to have to convert everything up front but I saw #260 and #304 and decided to take a stab. Please let me know what you think about including this for alpha support.
Happy to address any concerns or changes needed.