Expand literal function descriptor language [in progress] #113
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Full port of
litfun.scm
and the function descriptor language from scmutils.== Literal Function Descriptor Language
We support some of the possible literal function types; these are type signatures like
(-> (UP Real Real) Real)
. Butlitfun.scm
has support for a richer language.litfun.scm
and port the full scope of function descriptor language, including lots of helper functions likeLagrangian
. There are also many examples here that would make great tests. This can live inemmy.abstract.function.cljc
(UP* Real)
should work, with no explicit arity.([] '(-> (UP Real (UP* Real) (DOWN* Real)) Real))
([] '(-> (UP Real (UP* Real) (UP* Real)) Real))
. the current impl can't handle stars with no numbers.