T1 language support for simulation

[nagkumar91]

Description

This PR adds support for the following languages in adversarial simulators:

• Spanish (es)
• Italian (it)
• French (fr)
• German (de)
• Simplified Chinese (zh-cn)
• Portuguese (pt)
• Japanese (ja)
• English (en)

This provides parity with lasertag/babel language support.

All Promptflow Contribution checklist:

• The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes].
• CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• I confirm that all new dependencies are compatible with the MIT license.
• Create an issue and link to the pull request to get dedicated review from promptflow team. Learn more: suggested workflow.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

• Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
• There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

• Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

[github-actions]

promptflow-evals test result

 12 files  ±    0   12 suites  ±0   1h 48m 56s ⏱️ + 1h 28m 31s
 19 tests  -   106   12 ✅  -   113   7 💤 + 7  0 ❌ ±0 
228 runs   - 1 272  144 ✅  - 1 356  84 💤 +84  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit be18ece. ± Comparison against base commit b04e889.

This pull request removes 125 and adds 19 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

tests.evals.unittests.test_batch_run_context.TestBatchRunContext ‑ test_batch_timeout_custom
tests.evals.unittests.test_batch_run_context.TestBatchRunContext ‑ test_batch_timeout_default
tests.evals.unittests.test_batch_run_context.TestBatchRunContext ‑ test_with_codeclient
tests.evals.unittests.test_batch_run_context.TestBatchRunContext ‑ test_with_pfclient
tests.evals.unittests.test_built_in_evaluator.TestBuiltInEvaluators ‑ test_fluency_evaluator
tests.evals.unittests.test_built_in_evaluator.TestBuiltInEvaluators ‑ test_fluency_evaluator_empty_string
tests.evals.unittests.test_built_in_evaluator.TestBuiltInEvaluators ‑ test_fluency_evaluator_non_string_inputs
tests.evals.unittests.test_chat_evaluator.TestChatEvaluator ‑ test_conversation_validation_invalid_citations
tests.evals.unittests.test_chat_evaluator.TestChatEvaluator ‑ test_conversation_validation_missing_role
tests.evals.unittests.test_chat_evaluator.TestChatEvaluator ‑ test_conversation_validation_normal
…

tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_conversation_sim_responds_with_responses
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_eci_sim_responds_with_responses
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_protected_matierial_sim_responds_with_responses
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_qa_sim_responds_with_one_response
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_rewrite_sim_responds_with_responses
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_sim_init_with_prod_url
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_sim_order_randomness
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_sim_order_randomness_with_jailbreak
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_summarization_jailbreak_sim_responds_with_responses
tests.evals.e2etests.test_adv_simulator.TestAdvSimulator ‑ test_adv_summarization_sim_responds_with_responses
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Hi, thank you for your interest in helping to improve the prompt flow experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment.

[github-actions]

Hi, thank you for your interest in helping to improve the prompt flow experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment.

[github-actions]

Hi, thank you for your contribution. Since there has not been recent engagement, we are going to close this out. Feel free to reopen if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to remove the no-recent-activity label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass.