Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.Net: Plans using FunctionRunner + RequestSettings (Revert) #3279

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2023

Conversation

RogerBarreto
Copy link
Member

This change actually added a regression on the hooks, duplicating the triggering while using plans.

RequestSettings at the Kernel level needd more discussion.

Reverts #3264

@RogerBarreto RogerBarreto requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2023 14:59
@shawncal shawncal added .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel kernel.core labels Oct 24, 2023
@RogerBarreto RogerBarreto added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 24, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5bfff5d Oct 24, 2023
21 checks passed
@RogerBarreto RogerBarreto deleted the revert-3264-features/plans-functionrunner branch October 24, 2023 15:17
SOE-YoungS pushed a commit to SOE-YoungS/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
…t#3279)

This change actually added a regression on the hooks, duplicating the
triggering while using plans.

RequestSettings at the Kernel level needd more discussion.

Reverts microsoft#3264
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kernel Issues or pull requests impacting the core kernel .NET Issue or Pull requests regarding .NET code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants