Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADR Custom Prompt Template Formats #3286

Conversation

markwallace-microsoft
Copy link
Member

Motivation and Context

ADR Custom Prompt Template Formats

Contribution Checklist

@shawncal shawncal added the docs and tests Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 24, 2023
@RogerBarreto
Copy link
Member

Nit suggestion.

Add in your diagrams the Factory -> Factory chaining description.

@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 27, 2023
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit d6f7ccc Oct 27, 2023
12 checks passed
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft deleted the users/markwallace/adr-custom-prompt-template-formats branch October 27, 2023 15:01
SOE-YoungS pushed a commit to SOE-YoungS/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
### Motivation and Context

ADR Custom Prompt Template Formats

### Contribution Checklist

- [x] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [x] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [x] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [x] I didn't break anyone 😄

---------

Co-authored-by: Roger Barreto <19890735+RogerBarreto@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs and tests Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants