Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(wip) Test PR for PR Assigner -- please do not review #12334

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dana-gill
Copy link
Contributor

@dana-gill dana-gill commented Dec 20, 2024

Summary

This is a test PR for the PR Assigner -- please do not review 🙏

Related Linear tickets, Github issues, and Community forum posts

Review / Merge checklist

  • PR title and summary are descriptive. (conventions)
  • Docs updated or follow-up ticket created.
  • Tests included.
  • PR Labeled with release/backport (if the PR is an urgent fix that needs to be backported)

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added n8n team Authored by the n8n team node/improvement New feature or request labels Dec 20, 2024
@dana-gill dana-gill requested review from ShireenMissi and michael-radency and removed request for ShireenMissi December 20, 2024 14:59
@michael-radency
Copy link
Contributor

@dana-gill could you please update PR title and description

@dana-gill dana-gill changed the title Node 2184 pr assigner (wip) Test PR for PR -- please do not review Dec 27, 2024
@dana-gill dana-gill changed the title (wip) Test PR for PR -- please do not review (wip) Test PR for PR Assigner -- please do not review Dec 27, 2024
@dana-gill
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dana-gill could you please update PR title and description

Sure thing :) It's a test PR for the PR Assigner I'm building. Sorry for the noise!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
n8n team Authored by the n8n team node/improvement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants