Prefer strings.Cut to strings.SplitN(..., 2)

[serprex]

No description provided.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: serprex / name: Philip Dubé (1a59e77, 5e85489)
• ✅ login: mx-psi / name: Pablo Baeyens (53147f7, e3bc69f)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.62%. Comparing base (7c26397) to head (e3bc69f).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11758      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.62%   91.62%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         447      447              
  Lines       23739    23735       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        21751    21747       -4     
  Misses       1613     1613              
  Partials      375      375              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[serprex]

Should add Skip Changelog to Labels

[dmathieu]

I'm not sure this doesn't need a changelog entry.
While readability improvements definitely don't, switching from strings.Cut to strings.SplitN also reduces the number of allocations. So it's a small improvement in memory use.

[github-actions]

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

[github-actions]

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

[mx-psi]

@serprex Can you fix the linting failures?

Error: identifiable.go:130:10: indent-error-flow: if block ends with a return statement, so drop this else and outdent its block (revive)

Sorry, it seems I enabled automerge but the PR didn't go through